Thursday, April 19, 2012

Press Release: Citizens filed Constitutional Petition in Sindh High Court against Internet Censorship



Karachi: On the 17th of April 2012, seven individuals, Awab Alvi, Sana Saleem, Faisal Kapadia, Nazim Haji, Naeem Sadiq, Noman Quadri and Ayesha Tammy Haq through their lawyer Haider Waheed & Basil Nabi Malik, petitioned the High Court of Sindh at Karachi challenging the arbitrary and random acts of the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) in blocking/ censoring and restricting access to various websites in violation of the fundamental rights of the owners of the websites/online forums as well as the public at large, and without affording the aggrieved persons an opportunity of being heard or due notice. It was prayed in the said petition that no website could be blocked/ censored or restricted without affording the aggrieved parties (including the public at large) due notice and an opportunity to be heard in accordance with Articles 4, 9, 10-A, 18, 19, 19A, 20 and 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, read with Section 6 of the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority Act, 1996. The Honorable High Court of Sindh issued notice to the Federation of Pakistan, through the Secretary, Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunication, and the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority, through its Chairman, and furthermore ordered the PTA said not to block any website other than in accordance with the provisions of the Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-Organization) Act, 1996. It may be noted that as per the PTA Act, the correct procedure to be followed before blocking or censoring of websites is as per Section 6 of the said Act, which states:

Section 6. Responsibilities of the Authority.—In exercising its functions and powers under this Act, the Authority shall ensure that:
- Rights of licensees are duly protected;
- All of its decisions and determinations are made promptly, in an open equitable, non-discriminatory, consistent and transparent manner;
- All applications made to it are disposed of expeditiously;
- The persons affected by its decisions or determinations are given a due notice thereof and provided with an opportunity of being heard;
- Fair competition in the telecommunication sector exists and is maintained
- The interests of users of telecommunication services are duly safeguarded and protected.

The intention of the said petition was to bring the entire process under judicial review to insure its fairness, transparency, to prevent ad hoc blocking, to provide a proper system of redress to the parties owning these websites and forums and to protect the fundamental rights of the public at large including internet users in Pakistan.

Monday, August 22, 2011

Letter to President and Prime Minister - KCCF Demands re Karachi's situation



From Karachi Concerned Citizens Forum
kccf.khi@gmail.com

To
The President of Pakistan
and Prime Minister of Pakistan


You represent the unity of the federation of Pakistan and, as such, must ensure that the federal as well as provincial governments deliver on commitments of the federation, the most important of them being the security of all its citizens.

Karachi which is Pakistan’s largest city in terms of population and geographical limits and contributes over 20% of Pakistan’s GPD, is currently facing extreme violence which has resulted in hundreds of deaths and crippled its economic activity. The livelihood of millions of daily wage earners have been the most affected.

Karachi’s citizens demand that the government and political leadership of the country take immediate steps to restore peace and stability so economic activities in the city can be restored.

Concerned Citizens Forum after extensive consultations with Karachites from all professions and walks of life suggest the flowing action plan to save Karachifrom the verge of collapse:

1. Immediate and permanent stop to all calls for shutter down/ wheel jam strikes by political parties or any other group.
2. Protest and Political rallies to be restricted to designated areas in the city and under no circumstances should they be allowed to take place on main thoroughfares and commercial/industrial areas. This invariably leads to disruption of peace and economic activity which has damaged the image of Karachias a dependable supplier of goods and services.
3. Call for complete ban on display of weapons by political party workers, should the workers of any party be found doing so, that party’s leadership should be held accountable for this violation. This will create an environment for the complete de-weaponization of Karachi.
4. Ensure that party workers do not commit random or targeted killing or damage public or private property. Should the workers of a political party be caught doing so, that party‘s leadership should be held accountable for these crimes.
5. All political parties should identify miscreants/militants within their ranks and expose them for appropriate punitive action as per the law of the land.
6. Political wall chalking that incite hatred and violence be declared illegal. Provincial
7. Authorities should be ordered to whitewash all wall chalking with immediate effect.

We take this opportunity to assure you and your administration of our complete support in implementing this plan to bring peace to Karachi.

Sunday, December 19, 2010

Blasphemy Laws in Pakistan: Make them better if not Change


By Amer Nadeem Adv

The author is an Attorney at Law/ Legal Consultant, has worked with various Government Organizations & NGOs on issues pertaining to Human Rights and has also initiated campaigns
.

_________________________________________________________

From the gathering laws, reported cases and my personal experience as a lawyer engaged in a number of blasphemy cases court proceedings, I have written this paper added with some valuable suggestions. These suggestions are of change in procedure rather substantive laws. These changes in procedure can be helpful to avoid the innocent to be victim of these laws. A procedure to sort out the truth, certainly, will be a hurdle in the way to involve the innocent. This could be a great beneficial for depressed and down trodden sections of the society, including minority who are vulnerable to these laws. Essence of the law is always to reach the truth.

Blasphemy in Modern World

The concept of blasphemous legislation is not novel in the modern world. In a number of countries the blasphemy acts or omissions as offences can be traced out. Ireland may be the most recent example. In January 2010, in Ireland the blasphemy law was enacted and now law of the land. In Ireland laws Blsaphemy is described as "publishing or uttering matter that is grossly abusive or insulting in relation to matters sacred by any religion, thereby intentionally causing outrage among a substantial number of adherents of that religion, with some defences permitted".

In England all blasphemies against God, the Christian religion, the Holy Scriptures, and malicious revilings of the established church, were punishable by indictment. The common law offences of blasphemy and blasphemous libel were abolished by the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008. Similarly, in a recent verdict by Supreme Court of Malaysia, the blasphemous laws of 1965 have been upheld. In United Arab Emirates & Bangladesh blasphemy is crime.

This offence has been enlarged in Pennsylvania, and perhaps most of the states, by statutory provision. Vide Christianity; 11 Serg. & Rawle, 394. 1 East, P. C. 3; 1 Russ. on Cr. 217. In France, before the 25th of September, 1791, it was a blasphemy also to speak against the holy virgin and the saints, to deny one's faith, to speak with impiety of holy things, and to swear by things sacred. Merl. Rep. h. t. The law relating to blasphemy in that country was totally repealed by the code of 25th of September, 1791, and its present penal code, art. 262, enacts, that any person who, by words or gestures, shall commit any outrage upon objects of public worship, in the places designed or actually employed for the performance of its rites, or shall assault or insult the ministers of such worship in the exercise of their functions, shall be fined from sixteen to five hundred francs, and be imprisoned for a period not less than fifteen days nor more than six months. In Spain it is blasphemy not only to speak against God and his government, but to utter injuries against the Virgin Mary and the saints. {1}

Defamation of religion is an issue that has been repeatedly addressed by the United Nations since 1999. In that year, Pakistan brought before the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, under the agenda item on racism, a resolution entitled "Defamation of Islam." The resolution expressed concern at the negative stereotyping of Islam, and urged the members of the United Nations to combat religious intolerance against Muslims. The Commission adopted the resolution after its title was changed to "Defamation of religions," and its purport was changed to embrace all religions. Each year between 1999 and 2006, the Commission approved similar resolutions. In March 2006, the Human Rights Commission became the United Nations Human Rights Council. The UNHRC approved similar resolutions for 2006 and thereafter. Beginning in 2005, the United Nations General Assembly adopted annually a resolution entitled "Combating Defamation of Religions". On 25 March 2010, 20 members of the UNHRC voted in favour of a resolution entitled "Combating defamation of religions"; 17 members voted against the resolution; 8 abstained; 2 were absent. {2}.

Publishing of caricatures in the newspapers of Sweden & Norway added with recent facebook pages issue have initiated a new debate on the laws of Blasphemy. Despite the fact that the presence of blasphemy laws is there in various countries of the world, a comparison of those clauses & practice with Pakistan scenario reveals two considerable factors; first the complaints of misuse of these laws are rare, second magnitude of sentence is mild in.Whereas in Pakistan, the scenario is entirely different.


{1}. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/blasphemy
{2}. http://www.answers.com/topic/defamation-of-religions-and-the-united-nations

Dawn of Blasphemy Laws in Pakistan

The history of blasphemy laws in Pakistan is as old as the advent of criminal penal laws. The ex-rulers of the sub continent, the Britishers were well aware of the religious sentiments of people of the land. It was land of five major religious communities; the Hindus, the Muslims, the Sikhs, the Buddhists and the Christians. The people were highly sensitive to protect their religious values. The element of orthodoxism blended with liberal saint preaching was order of the day.

It was 1860, when the law of Penal Code was enacted in the sub-continent. The Code after partition of sub-continent was titled as Pakistan Penal Code. The chapter XV (fifteen) pertains to the blasphemous laws. It was part of the original code of 1860. The chapter consists of four sections. They numbered from 295 to 298. However, in preceding years a number of additional sub-clauses were added. Basic purpose of the chapter was to provide punishments, which are rather mild in their nature, for injuring the religious feelings of any citizen of the land. These punishments were ranging from one to two years. The mense rea (bad intention) was essence of the offences.

The act of injuring or defiling place of worship with the intention to insult the religion of any class is declared an offence. The punishment for the offence is provided in section 295 of Pakistan Penal Code as two years or fine or both. The offence is cognizable, bailable and non compoundable.

To disturb a religious assembly including worship or ceremonies is an act of offence under section 296 of Pakistan Penal Code. The punishment provided in the clause is one year or fine or both. The offence is declared as cognizable, bailable and non compoundable, as amended in 1927.

The legislators of that time was conscious even to the extent that the trespassing on any burial / funeral place or humiliate a dead body was declared as an offence under section 297 of Pakistan Penal Code. The punishment provided for the offence is one year sentence, or fine or both. The offence is declared cognizable, bailable and non compoundable.

At the last but not least, the act of wounding the religious feelings of any person is declared as an offence under section 298 of Pakistan Penal Code with the punishment of one year sentence or fine or both. The offence is declared non cognizable, bailable and compoundable.

In the coming years of the reign of the Britishers, the circumstances and ground realities compelled the rulers to bring new stern blasphemy laws to meet with the unavoidable needs of the day. It was 1927, when the act of outraging/insult the religious feelings/beliefs of any person of the land was declared as crime. The section 295 A was added with punishment of ten years as sentence or fine or both. The offence is non cognizable, non bailable and non compoundable. The offence was declared as offence against state, private person can not initiate proceedings against the accused. Under section 196 of Criminal Procedure Code, it is only the state or provincial government who can take up the matter to the court.

During the days of Military Dictator Gen. Zia-ul-Haq a number of sections in the blasphemy laws were added in Pakistan Penal Code. In 1982, defiling or desecrating of Holy Quran was declared as offence with punishment of imprisonment of life (25 years) via section 295 B. In 1986, through 295 C the blasphemy of Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was declared offence with death penalty or imprisonment of life. These two sections are cognizable, non compoundable and non bailable. Furthermore, in 1980, the blasphemous remarks or acts towards companion (SAHABA), family members of Holy Prophet (PBUH) was declared as an offence punishable with three years of sentence, in section 298-A. Whereas, in 1984, certain activities and practices of Qadyani group were declared unlawful via section 298 B and 298 C both with three years sentence.

Nature of Offences……. Cognizable and Non Cognizable

In Pakistani criminal procedure laws, offences are divided into two categories, cognizable and non cognizable. Cognizable offence means an offence in which Police can register direct criminal case, initiate the investigation and arrest the accused without interference of the court. In these offences Police has unfetter powers to proceed on getting information that a cognizable offence has been committed. In the cases the Police officer is not required to consult or inform or get permission from the concerned magistrate/judge. In these matters whole the process of the registration of the criminal case, investigation, arrest of the accused and other relevant proceedings lie with the whims and caprice of Police officials. {1}

In non cognizable offence Police can not register the criminal case or proceed investigation without permission of the magistrate/judge. In these offences, on receiving information through any means or informer, the Police official is duty bound to refer the matter with informal to the magistrate. Then it is court to go through the matter/information of the offence, if the court deems fit case of further proceeding then the Police is permitted by the magistrate to investigate and/or arrest the accused. {2}

It can be safely said that in non cognizable offences possibilities of booking innocent persons in the cases is dim. A preliminary enquiry like proceeding is conducted by the magistrate/judge, then criminal proceedings are initiated. As it is mentioned above that the offences of 295 A and 298 of PPC is non cognizable, whereas other offences are cognizable.

{1} (For reference sec 4 F, 154 and 156 of Cr.P.C.)
{2} (For reference sec 155 of Cr.P.C.)

Who are the victims?

Lahore High Court Division Bench while acquitting an accused of 295 C of PPC, who was under death penalty, referred a report of news paper as under {1}:

“It appears that ever since the law became more stringent, there has been an increase in the number of registration of the blasphemy cases. A report from theDaily Dawn of 18th July, 2002, says that between 1948 and 1979, 11 cases of blasphemy were registered. Three cases were reported between the period 1979 and 1986. Forty four cases were registered between 1987 and 1999. In 2000, fifty two cases were registered and strangely, 43 cases had been registered against the Muslims while 9 cases were registered against the non Muslims, The report further states that this shows that the law was being abused more blatantly by the Muslims against the Muslims to settle their scores. Because the police would readily register such a case and without checking the veracity of the facts and without taking proper guidance from any well known and unbiased religious scholar, would proceed to arrest an accused. That an Assistant Sub Inspector or a Moharrir was academically not competent to adjudge whether or not the circumstances constitute act of blasphemy.”

{1} P L D 2002 Lahore 587

Misuse of Blasphemy Laws

The blasphemy laws in Pakistan are being misused in mostly cases. Thanks to the uneducated, unskilled and ill motivated Police Officials dealing with the criminal cases, defective investigation and ignorance of law and procedure are the root cause of misuse of blasphemy laws in Pakistan. In the last pages it has already mentioned that with the enhancement of punishments the number of registered cases are at high. The malice of complainant and ill will investigation in the most cases are self evident from the fact that in ninety percent cases the accused of blasphemy laws are acquitted. The above stated position has mentioned in a number of High Court judgments. Even Lahore High Court went ahead to give some procedural directions to the Police.

Increase in the number of registration of blasphemy cases and element of mischief involved therein calls for extra care at the end of the Prosecuting Officers. Failure, inefficiency and incompetence of the Investigation in handling the case of blasphemy is there. Lahore High Court, in circumstances, directed the Inspector-¬General of Police of the Province to ensure that whenever such a case is registered, the same may be entrusted for purposes of investigation to a team of at least two Gazetted Investigating Officers preferably those conversant with the Islamic Jurisprudence and in case they themselves are not conversant with Islamic law, a scholar of known reputation and integrity may be added to the team and the team should then investigate as to whether an offence is committed or not and if the team comes to the conclusion that the offence is committed, the police may only then proceed further in the matter. Trial in such a case be held by a Court presided over by a Judicial Officer who himself is not less than the rank of District and Sessions Judge. {1}

{1} P L D 2002 Lahore 587

There is no secret that the blasphemy laws are being used to dig out the personal grudges and enmity between the parties. It is a strange fact that in a number of cases blasphemy clauses are added with the offence of theft, robbery, murder etc. It is difficult to understand that what is the nexus between blasphemy act and theft or robbery or murder. It seems that sometime the complainant to meet their desire to involve the culprits/accused in an offence of heinous nature, the blasphemy clauses are added.

Decades ago in the late 80s in the district of Larkana, an armed feud took place between two tribes. Both the tribes had history of old enmity. In the conflict, one tribe attacked other with deadly weapons caused fire armed injuries, set their houses on fire and snatched valuable goods with them. The Police registered case against 79 nominated accused and 30 unidentified accused persons under the offences of attempt to murder, burning houses and dacoity. Just to aggravate the case section 295 was added. There was no act of blasphemy but the clause was added. {1}

There was a dispute between the caretaker/employ of Muslim Oqaf government of Pakistan and a claimant of Gaddi Nasheen of a shrine in Jhang. Suddenly a conflict took place on the distribution of money in saving box of the shrine. The claimant of the Gaddi/Shrine registered a criminal case of blasphemy against the caretaker of the shrine. The Supreme Court of Pakistan turned down version of the complainant and declared the case as out come of personal enmity. {2}

In Lahore, there were criminal cases between two Christian persons, N and A. The A was witness against N and his father in a criminal case. The N and his father were accused persons in the case. N converted to Islam and after three months registered a blasphemy case against A, just to pacify his old grudge. The case was based on previous enmity and false one. {3}

{1} 1990 P Cr. L J Page. 609
{2} 2007 SCMR Page 1931
{3} 2005 P Cr. L J Page.1636

In Muzaffargarh, on enmity of two parties four persons were murdered, element of sectarianism was also there. The case was registered for the offence of murder, attempt to murder, illegal arms and blasphemy clause. The contention to the extent of blasphemy act was not accepted. {1}

In Talla Gang, the violence erupted between the followers of two sects. The Police on the application of one sectarian group registered criminal case against the other group. The case was registered on the offences of theft, set the building and vehicle on fire, damage to property, attempt to murder and the clause of 295 of PPC was also added in the case. {2}

A street dispute arouse in Jalaal Pur Jattan, Gujrat, between two sects. Each was claimant of the street and wanted to open a door in the street. On this issue a quarrel took place. One sectarian group was able to register criminal case of blasphemy clause along with other offences. {3}

In Sindh, one was able to get registered a criminal case against his opponent on kidnapping, grievious injury/hurt, theft and blasphemy clause was also added. Obviously, it was to enhance the magnitude of the case and sensitize it. Sindh High Court turned down the complainant’s version. {4}

In a district of Punjab, on account of old enmity one alleged that his opponent ceased to be Muslim and had converted to another religion. He requested for the registration of criminal case against his opponent on the charges of blasphemy. The opponent appeared in the court and stated that he is staunch Muslim. The court refused to accept the blasphemous version. {5}

{1} 2005 YLR Page 1856
{2} 2001 P Cr. L J Page 1981
{3} 1993 P Cr. L J Page 2410
{4} 1994 P Cr. L J Page 1760
{5} 2006 YLR Page 1766

Even a serving Major General of Army, who was posted as chairman WAPDA in 1977, was victim of blasphemy laws. While addressing in WAPDA house Lahore, to the employees on the topic of completion of Tarbela Dam project. The chairman was emphasizing that it would be a great service to Pakistan if the project be completed within time and dedication. Hot words were exchanged with some employees. The chairman was victim of blasphemy allegation. He was sacked from his job. However, Lahore High Court exonerated him from the charges of blasphemy and dropped the criminal proceedings against him. {1}

In Nawab Shah, Sindh, the Police officials were holding a search picket on a street. Some persons were ordered to be stopped for checking. A quarrel and exchange of abusive language took place there between the police and the persons. Illegal arms were recovered from the persons. Out of the grudge the Police registered case of offences in illegal arms, abstracting Police Officials from their duty and blasphemy clause 295 A of PPC. Sindh High Court acquitted all the accused from the charges with stern remarks against the Police Officials on their ill willed conduct. {2}

Beside personal enmities, ignorance of law and procedure are also one of the causes of misuse of these laws. Like in case of 295 A of PPC criminal case can be registered by an authorised officer of the Provincial government. A private person cannot be complainant/informer in the offence. Practice transpires another story. In a number of cases the legal procedure was over looked either by ignorance or with malice. {3}

{1} PLD 1978 Lahore Page 1082
{2} 2005 P Cr. L J Page 1683
{3} 2010 MLD Page 235, PLD 2005 Lahore Page 631, 2003 YLR Page 3137

Even in a number of cases incompetency on the part of Police was havoc for the accused persons, allegedly involved in the blasphemy cases. In the district of Sibbi, Balochistan, accused was booked in the blasphemy case on the statement of another accused. The investigation was defective. The Trial Court sentenced the accused person as life imprisonment. Quetta High Court acquitted all the accused declaring them innocent. {1}

In the city of Pasroor, Sialkot, a blasphemy case was registered. The Police arrested the accused and without proper investigation sent him in Jail. Whole the process was completed within less than 24 hours. Lahore High Court declared whole investigation and process null and void, acquitted the accused. {2}

Women are rarely booked in blasphemy cases. In the town of Raiwind, Lahore, a blasphemy case under 295 and 295 A of PPC and other clauses was registered against Sardaran Bibi. The complainant in the case alleged that the lady was used to give Taveez Ganda and she scribe Holy Verses in the process. It was version of the complainant that the lady committed blasphemy. The Lahore High Court did not agree with the version. {3}

Similarly, in another case in Changa Maanga, Lahore, a woman named Martha Bibi was booked in blasphemy offences. {4}

{1} PLD 2009 Quetta Page 1
{2} 2003 YLR Page 2422
{3} 2007 P Cr. L J Page 342
{4}2008 YLR Page 274

What To Do?


In the forgoing pages I have endeavoured of my best to avoid my personal findings or views. Purpose of this paper is to show a simple picture regarding the blasphemy laws, procedure and reported cases. At the stage some suggestions can be beneficial to mend the system. All efforts intend to save the innocents from the clutches of obsolete procedure and rotten investigation process.

• Blasphemy offences be declared as non cognizable offences. In the case Police would be duty bound to refer the matter to the Court. The Magistrate/Judge would thrash out the veracity of the complaint/allegation. In case magistrate/judge finds the allegation true, the Police would be allowed to proceed/investigate.

• The directions of Lahore High Court in P L D 2002 Lahore 587 be implemented in letter and spirit. In the direction, the Court has ordered IG Punjab to ensure that whenever a blasphemy case is registered, the case be investigated by a team, consisting of at least two Gazetted Investigating Officers preferably those conversant with the Islamic Jurisprudence and in case they themselves are not conversant with Islamic law, a scholar of known reputation and integrity may be added to the team and the team should then investigate as to whether an offence is committed or not and if the team comes to the conclusion that the offence is committed, the police may only then proceed further in the matter. Trial in such a case be held by a Court presided over by a Judicial Officer who himself is not less than the rank of District and Sessions Judge.

• To sensitize and train the Police Officials regarding the blasphemy laws with the history background and true spirit of the clauses and procedure of investigation. With focus on apprising them how the laws are being misused.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Pakistan Blasphemy Laws: A Fact Sheet

By Mansoor Raza
(Author is a Karachi based researcher affiliated with an international NGO)


The ghost of the draconian Blasphemy Laws, as enacted by the Gen. Zia-ul-Haque, haunts the present democratic set up as much as it does the Christian, Ahmadis and other minorities of Pakistan. Despite the consensus that there should be a total repeal of the Laws, the nuisance value of ultra-rightists prevents the Party of the poor from any daring action that would accrue anger of the mullahs. The enactment and acceptance of Blasphemy Laws is a result of the evolution of Pakistani state and before going into that it would be interesting to look at some basic facts about the Laws:

1. The Blasphemy Laws in the Pakistan Penal Code are rooted in the Indian Penal Code of 1860 and they were introduced through Sections 295-B and 295-C of the Pakistan Penal Code during the dictatorial regime of General Mohammad Zia-ul-Haq. The newly-introduced sections aimed to protect holy personages of only one religion, i.e. Islam, which is the state religion. Section 295-C which was added by an act of the parliament in 1986, and made it a criminal offence to use derogatory remarks in respect of the Holy Prophet (PBUH). Under Section 295-C, the offence was punishable with life imprisonment or death.

2. Between 1927 (year in which British colonial rulers introduced section 295-A) and 1986 there had been less than ten reported cases of blasphemy. However, 1986 onwards as many as 4,000 cases have been reported. Between 1988 and 2005, Pakistani authorities charged 647 people with offences under the Blasphemy Laws. Fifty percent of the people charged were non-Muslims. More than 20 people have been murdered for alleged blasphemy. Two third of all the cases are in the Punjab Province of Pakistan

3. The province of the Punjab is home to 81 percent Christians. The seven districts that have contributed most to the blasphemy cases are Lahore, Faisalabad, Sialkot, Kasur, Sheikhupura, Gujranwala and Toba Tek Singh. The total population of these districts is 25 million, of which five percent are Christian; 50 percent of total Christian population of Pakistan of 2.0 million lives in these seven districts; majority of Christians in the Punjab live in rural areas.

4. According to 1998 Census, the population of religious minorities, in Pakistan, is around six million or 3.7 percent of the total population. The Hindus and Christians constitute 83 percent of the religious minorities in Pakistan, with Hindus outnumbering Christians by a small margin and 93 percent of Hindus live in Sindh.

5. An analysis of 361 cases of blasphemy offences registered by the police between 1986 and 2007 shows that as many as 49 percent cases were registered against non-Muslims. The cases against non-Muslims should be contrasted with the population of religious minorities which is not more than four percent of Pakistan’s population. Moreover, 26 percent cases against Ahmadis and 21 percent cases against Christians are not in line with their ratio in total population, which is 0.22 and 1.58 percent of the total population respectively. The number of persons nominated in 361 cases was 761. Out of 361 total cases, more than two-thirds cases were found to be from the Punjab, 15 percent from Sindh and 5 percent from the NWFP.

6. Out of 35 districts in the Punjab, police in seven districts – all in central Punjab – had registered 10 or more cases during 1986 and 2007.

7. Forty one percent of all cases in terms of religion were registered. Nearly 65 percent of cases registered were against Christians, and Muslims were nominated in 43 percent cases.

8. A total of 104 cases reached the higher courts between 1960 and 2007, out of which 91 cases were heard by the High Courts in Pakistan and the AJK and the rest by the apex courts (Supreme Court and Shariat Court). In as many as 41 cases, section 295-C was invoked.

9. A study of data and cases study, suggest that there are three types of blasphemy cases:
i) cases which are mere accusations and are lodged to settle scores;
ii) cases which are based on expressing one’s faith, and
iii) cases in which the accused are known to be suffering from some kind of mental illness.

10. It is important to note that the laws introduced by General Zia-ul Haq, which were discriminatory against women and non-Muslims, were largely opposed by women rights organizations. It is unfortunate that some Christian political leadership continued to adjust their positions and sometimes came to defend these laws publicly.

Factors that paved way for the acceptance of the Blasphemy Laws and their endorsement (by a particular segment of the society) are rooted in the evolution of the state of Pakistan and the constitutional development, in a certain manner. Due to the demographic change that accompanied the partition of India in 1947, the areas that now comprise Pakistan changed from a multi-religious society to a mono-religious society. The social changes that are underway due to urbanization are taking on the traditional class structure that defined neatly the occupational distribution of classes and castes throughout centuries. The resulting fissures are creating tension between the groups and the warring sections are in search of ideologies to justify their struggle; a mere expression of tussle of aspirations. Traditionally, minorities found refuge in liberal politics and served the left leaning parties, but lately the liberal parties are losing fast the electoral battle in the decisive constituencies of the province of the Punjab. It is noted with great caution that the demography of Christians is heavily skewed in the Punjab, where the PPP is showing steady signs of involuntary withdrawal. The replacing of the PML (N) by the PPP will have an adverse impact on the future of minorities in the province. It is safely concluded that religious aspirations of state are used by adventurists to fight an otherwise war of economic aspirations. The Pakistan People’s Party failed to comprehend the evolving new realities and thus lost fast in the electoral battle grounds of the Punjab.

In the light of the above-mentioned balance sheet the total repeal of the Blasphemy Laws is only possible through mass awareness, organized campaigns and galvanizing progressive religious leaders for the greater cause of protection of humanity. The state needs to remain neutral and secular in its policies.

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Blasphemy, Its Law, and the Pakistani Society


By Dr. Khalid Zaheer (Religious Scholar)

(Translation of speech delivered by him at the Peoples Resistance (a civil society group) sponsored seminar on Blasphemy Law on Oct 24, 2009)


As a student of the Qur'an, I would like to mention a few points regarding the debate on whether there should be a blasphemy law in Pakistan or not.

1) There is no blasphemy law in Islam. Even though there are several mentions of blasphemy committed on the part of both polytheists of Makkah and Jews and hypocrites of Madinah against Islam and its prophet, may Allah's mercy be on him, no worldly punishment has even been hinted at in the Qur'an. The Qur'an keeps urging Muslims to ignore what the blasphemers were doing, to not be a part of them when they blaspheme, and create circumstances that do not allow blasphemy to take place.

2) Why then do many Muslims believe the reality to be otherwise? It is because in the books of hadith and history there are incidents reporting that some people got killed apparently for the crime of blasphemy. The reality about such killings is that only those people lost their lives according to the divine law who refused to accept God's message when it was clearly delivered to them by the messenger. According to the Qur'an, it was a punishment that had to be meted out to the enemies of the messengers who took on them during their lifetime. Such incidents have nothing with the issue of blasphemy in our times.

3) If Muslims wish to have a blasphemy law, they cannot be stopped from having one, especially given the fact there are laws in the Western countries protecting the honour of their kings and queens and the reverence associated with the tragedy of the holocaust. However, from an Islamic point of view, it must satisfy the following two conditions:

* a) Capital punishment cannot be given to a person who is found guilty of committing blasphemy. According to the Qur'an, capital punishment can only be given to murderers and those who take the law into their hands. (Qur'an; 5:32)
* b) The punishment should be applicable to those found guilty of blasphemy against revered personalities and deities of all faiths and it should be equally applicable to both Muslims and non-Muslims. The Qur'an says: "Don't use abusive language against their false gods lest they should use the same language against yours in retaliation." (Qur'an; 6:108)

4) There are two types of allegations of blasphemy that can be reported against non-Muslims: those that are in the category of religious disagreements which were natural to arise if one were living in a society where several religions were followed. Such disagreements and the expression of them must never be considered punishable. There could also be serious remarks of, or acts implying, blatant insult reported against an authority worthy of respect for people following a faith. Such remarks or acts need to be curbed through the blasphemy law.

5) Muslims must apologize to their non-Muslims brothers and sisters for the unwarranted excesses committed against them in the name of religion in the past to ease the unnecessary tension that has obsessed the minds of non-Muslim Pakistanis on the issue of blasphemy.

6) Muslims should condemn or at least not hold as their heroes those individuals who took the lives of non-Muslims who were accused blasphemy. When the killers of alleged blasphemers are considered as heroes, there is little possibility of stopping other aspirant heroes to repeat the feat.

7) Muslims should stop using the derogatory expression Kafir for the non-Muslim. A Kafir, according to the Qur'an is an individual who knows what the true message of God is and yet instead of acknowledging it, he goes on to reject, condemn, and oppose it. Only God can decide who a Kafir is. It is quite clear from the Qur'an that Muslims and non-Muslims can both be Kafir. A Kafir is worse than beasts according to the book of God and therefore if Muslims believe that non-Muslims are Kafir, they cannot respect them from their hearts.

8) All incidents where individuals have enforced or attempted to enforce their understanding of the blasphemy law through their own hands should be subjected to severe punishments to ensure that such crimes are never repeated. No individual has the right to bypass the due process of the law by taking it in his own hands. The one who does it cannot be the hero of Muslims; in fact, he is a criminal in the eyes of God and should be given severe punishment.

9) People who prevent judges from taking impartial decisions on alleged crimes of blasphemy should be taken to task.

10) The relationship of a Muslims with a non-Muslims is that of a person who invites the other to understand a certain concept. Muslims have an ideology which they believe is from God. Their obligation is two-fold: They should follow their ideology so well that people get impressed by their behaviour. If non-Muslims are drawn away from their ideology because of their unimpressive behaviour, they will be blamed for causing others to be drawn away from God's message. They are also expected, if they are knowledgeable enough, to politely convey God's message to them. In doing so they have to patiently and intelligently respond to the questions non-Muslims will raise. Muslims therefore cannot afford to be impolite with their non-Muslim brothers and sisters. They should be guided by the following Qur'anic passage: "Who can be better in speech than the one who invites others towards God, does good deeds, and says that I am only a servant of God. Good and bad behaviours cannot be the same. You repel a bad behaviour with a good one; as a consequence, you will see that the one with whom you had enmity will become your good friend. However, such an attitude can only be displayed by the ones who are the most fortunate and the ones who are patient. And if Satan whispers into your heart anything negative, seek refuge in God. Indeed He hears and knows." (Qur'an; 41:33-36)

11) The government, NGOs, and the civil society of the country should undertake concerted efforts to educate the Muslim masses on the right attitude towards people belonging to others faiths in the light of the teachings of the Qur'an. For the purpose, mosques, educational institutions, and the print and electronic media should be effectively utilized. 

Friday, April 2, 2010

THE PROTECTION AGAINST HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT THE WORKPLACE ACT 2010


[THE PROTECTION AGAINST HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT THE WORKPLACE ACT 2010]

To make provisions for the protection against harassment of women at the workplace
WHEREAS the constitution recognizes the fundamental rights of citizens to dignity of person;
AND WHEREAS it is expedient to make this provision for the protection of women from harassment at the workplace;
It is hereby enacted as follows:

1. Short title and commencement. -
(1) This Act may be called the Protection against Harassment of women at the Workplace Act, 2009.
(2) It extends to the whole of Pakistan.
(3) It shall come into force at once.

2. Definitions. – In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context,–
(a) “accused” means an employee or employer of an organization against whom complaint has been made under this Act;
(b) CBA means Collective Bargain Agent as provided in the Industrial Relations Act 2008, or any other law for the time being in force.
(c) “Code” means the Code of Conduct as mentioned in the Schedule to this Act;
(d) “Competent Authority” the authority as may be designated by the management for the purposes of this Act;
(e) “Complainant” means a woman & men who has made a complaint to the Ombudsman or to the Inquiry Committee on being aggrieved by an act of harassment;
(f) “Employee” means a regular or contractual employee whether employed on daily, weekly, or monthly or hourly basis, and includes an intern or an apprentice;
(g) “Employer” in relation to an organization, means any person or body of persons whether incorporated or not, who or which employs workers in an organization under a contract of employment and includes – (i) an heir, successor or assign, as the case may be, of such person or, body as aforesaid; (ii) any person responsible for the direction, administration, management and control of the management; (iii) the authority, in relation of an organization or a group of organization run by or under the authority of any Ministry or department of the Federal Government or a Provincial government, appointed in this behalf or, where no authority is appointed, the head of the Ministry or department as the case may be; (iv) the office bearer, in relation to an organization run by or on behalf of the local authority, appointed in this behalf, or where no officer is so appointed, the chief executive officer bearer of that authority; (v) the proprietor, in relation to any other organization, of such organization and every director, manager, secretary, agent or office bearer or person concerned with the management of the affairs thereof. (vi) A contractor or an organization of a contractor who or which undertakes to procure the labour or services of employees for use by another person or in another organization for any purpose whatsoever and for payment in any form and on any basis whatsoevery; and (vi) office bearers of a department of a Division of a Federal or a Provincial or local authority who belong to the managerial, secretarial or directional cadre or categories of supervisors or agents and those who have been notified for this purpose in the official Gazette;
(h) harassment” means any unwelcome sexual advance, request for sexual favors or other verbal or written communication or physical conduct of a sexual nature or sexually demeaning attitudes, causing interference with work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment, or the attempt to punish the complainant for refusal to comply to such a request or is made a condition for employment;
(i) “Inquiry Committee” means the Inquiry Committee established under sub-section (1) of section 3;
(j) “management” means a person or body of persons responsible for the management of the affairs of an organization and includes an employer;
(k) “Ombudsman” means the Ombudsman appointed under section 7
(l) “organization” means a Federal or Provincial Government Ministry, Division or department, a corporation or any autonomous or semi-autonomous body, Educational Institutes, Medical facilities established or controlled by the Federal or Provincial Government or District Government or registered civil society associations or privately managed a commercial or an industrial establishment or institution, a company as defined in the Companies Ordinance, 1984 and includes any other registered private sector organization or institution;
(m) “Schedule” means Schedule annexed to this Act;
(n) “workplace” means the place of work or the premises where an organization or employer operates and includes building, factory, open area or a larger geographical area where the activities of the organization or of employer are carried out and including any situation that is linked to official work or official activity outside the office; and

3. Inquiry Committee. –
(1) Each organization shall constitute an Inquiry Committee within thirty days of the enactment of this Act to enquire into complaints under this Act.
(2) The Committee shall consist of three members of whom at least one member shall be a woman. One member shall be from senior management and one shall
be a senior representative of the employees or a senior employee where there is no CBA. One or more members can be co-opted from outside the organization if the organization is unable to designate three members from within as described above. A Chairperson shall be designated from amongst them.
(3) In case a complaint is made against one of the members of the Inquiry Committee that member should be replaced by another for that particular case. Such member may be from within or outside the organization;
(4) In case where no competent authority is designated the organization shall within thirty days of the enactment of this Act designate a competent authority

4. Procedure for holding inquiry.–
(1) The Inquiry Committee, within three days of receipt of a written complaint, shall– (a) communicate formal written receipt of which will be given to the accused the charges and statement of allegations leveled against him; (b) require the accused within seven days from the day the charge is communicated to him to submit a written defense and on his failure to do so without reasonable cause, the Committee shall proceed ex-parte; (c) enquire into the charge and may examine such oral or documentary evidence in support of the charge or in defense of the accused as the Committee may consider necessary and each party shall be entitled to cross-examine the witnesses against him.
(2) Subject to the provisions of this Act and any rules made thereunder the Inquiry Committee shall have power to regulate its own procedure for conducting inquiry and for the fixing place and time of its sitting.
(3) The following provisions inter alia shall be followed by the Committee in relation to inquiry: (a) The statements and other evidence acquired in the inquiry process shall be considered as confidential;(b) An officer in an organization, if considered necessary, may be nominated to provide advice and assistance to each party; (c) Both parties, the complainant and the accused, shall have the right to be represented or accompanied by a Collective Bargaining Agent representative, a friend or a colleague; (d) Adverse action shall not be taken against the complainant or the witnesses; (e) The inquiry Committee shall ensure that the employer or accused shall in no case create any hostile environment for the complainant so as to pressurize her from freely pursuing her complaint; and (f) The Inquiry Committee shall give its findings in writing by recording reasons thereof.
(4) The Inquiry Committee shall submit its findings and recommendations to the Competent Authority within thirty days of the initiation of inquiry. If the Inquiry Committee finds the accused to be guilty it shall recommend to the Competent Authority for imposing one or more of the following penalties:
(i) Minor penalties:
(a) censure;
(b) withholding, for a specific period, promotion or increment;
(c) stoppage, for a specific period, at an efficiency bar in the time-scale, otherwise than for unfitness to cross such bar;
(d) recovery of the compensation payable to the complainant from pay or any other source of the accused;
(ii) Major penalties:
(a) reduction to a lower post or time-scale, or to a lower stage in a time-scale; (b) compulsory retirement;
(c) removal from service; and
(d) dismissal from service.
(e) Fine. A part of the fine can be used as compensation for the complainant. In case of the owner, the fine shall be payable to the complainant.
(5) The Competent Authority shall impose the penalty recommended by the Inquiry Committee under sub-section (4) within one week of the receipt of the recommendations of the inquiry committee (6) The Inquiry Committee shall meet on regular basis and monitor the situation regularly until they are satisfied that their recommendations subject to decision, if any of Competent Authority and Appellate Authority have been implemented. (7) In case the complainant is in trauma the organization will arrange for psycho-social counseling or medical treatment and for additional medical leave. (8) The organization may also offer compensation to the complainant in case of loss of salary or other damages.

5. Powers of the Inquiry Committee. –
(1) The Inquiry Committee shall have power– (a) to summon and enforce attendance of any person and examine him on oath; (b) to require the discovery and production of any document; (c) to receive evidence on affidavits; and (d) to record evidence.
(2) The Inquiry Committee shall have the power to inquire into the matters of harassment under this Act, to get the complainant or the accused medically examined by authorized doctor, if necessary, and may recommend appropriate penalty against the accused within the meaning of sub-section (4) of section 4.
(3) The Inquiry Committee may recommend to Ombudsman for appropriate action against the complainant if allegations leveled against the accused found to be false and made with mala fide intentions.
(4) The Inquiry Committee can instruct to treat the proceedings confidential.

6. Appeal against minor and major penalties.–
(1) Any party aggrieved by decision of the Competent Authority on whom minor or major penalty is imposed may within thirty days of written communication of decision prefer an appeal to an Ombudsman established under section 7 .
(2) A complainant aggrieved by the decision of the Competent Authority may also prefer appeal within thirty days of the decision to the Ombudsman.
(3) The Appellate Authority may, on consideration of the appeal and any other relevant material, confirm, set aside, vary or modify the decision within thirty days in respect of which such appeal is made. It shall communicate the decision to both the parties and the employer.
(4) Until such a time that the ombudsman is appointed the District Court shall have the jurisdiction to hear appeals against the decisions of Competent Authority and the provisions of sub-sections (1) to (3) shall mutatis mutandis apply
(5) On the appointment of Ombudsman all appeals pending before the District Court shall stand transferred to Ombudsman who may proceed with the case from the stage at which it was pending immediately before such transfer.

7. Ombudsman:-
(1) The respective Governments shall appoint an ombudsman at the Federal and provincial levels.
(2) A person shall be qualified to be appointed as an Ombudsman who has been a judge of high court or qualified to be appointed as a judge of high court. The Ombudsman may recruit such staff as required to achieve the purposes of this Act and the finances will be provided by the respective Governments

8. Ombudsman to enquire into complaint.-
(1) Any employee shall have the option to prefer a complaint either to the Ombudsman or the Inquiry Committee. „
(2) The Ombudsman shall within 3 days of receiving a complaint issue a written show cause notice to the accused. The Accused after the receipt of written notice shall submit written defense to the Ombudsman within five days and his failure to do so without reasonable cause the Ombudsman may proceed ex parte. Both the parties can represent themselves before the Ombudsman.
(3)The Ombudsman shall conduct an inquiry into the matter according to the rules made under this Act and conduct proceedings as the Ombudsman deems proper.
(4) For the purposes of an investigation under this Act, the Ombudsman may require any office or member of an organization concerned to furnish any information or to produce any document which in the opinion of the Ombudsman is relevant and helpful in the conduct of the investigation.
(5) The Ombudsman shall record his decision and inform both parties and the management of the concerned organization for implementation of the orders.

9. Representation to President or Governor:- Any person aggrieved by a decision of Ombudsman under sub- section (5) of section 8, may, within thirty days of decision, would like a representation to the President or Governor, as the case may be, who may pass such order thereon as he may deem fit.

10. Powers of the Ombudsman The Ombudsman shall for the purpose of this Act have the same powers as are vested in a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedures, 1908 (Act V of 1908), in respect of the following matters, namely:
i. Summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him on oath;
ii. Compelling the production of evidence;
iii. Receiving evidence on affidavits; and
iv. Issuing commission for the examination of witnesses
v. Entering any premises for the purpose of making any inspection or investigation, enter any premises where the Ombudsman has a reason to believe that any information relevant to the case may be found; and
vi. The Ombudsman shall have the same powers as the High Court has to punish any person for its contempt.
(2) Ombudsman shall while making the decision on the complaint may impose any of the minor or major penalties specified in sub- section (4) of section 4.

11. Responsibility of employer.–
(1) It shall be the responsibility of the employer to ensure implementation of this Act, including but not limited to incorporate the Code of Conduct for protection against harassment at the workplace as a part of their management policy and to form Inquiry Committee referred to in section 3 and designate a competent authority referred to in section 4.
(2) The management shall display copies of the Code in English as well as in language understood by the majority of employees at conspicuous place in the organization and the work place within six months of the commencement of this Act. (3) On failure of an employer to comply with the provisions of this section any employee of an organization may file a petition before the District Court and on having been found guilty the employer shall be liable to fine which may extend to one hundred thousand rupees but shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees.

12. Provisions of the Act in addition to and not in derogation of any other law.– The provisions of this Act shall be in addition to and not in derogation of any other law for the time being in force.

13. Power to make rules.-The Federal Government may make rules to carryout the purposes of this Act.

Schedule (See section 2(b) and l)

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR PROTECTION AGAINST HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT THE WORKPLACE

Whereas it is expedient to make the Code of Conduct at the Workplace etc to provide protection and safety to women against harassment it is hereby provided as under: (i) The Code provides a guideline for behavior of all employees, including management, and the owners of an organization to ensure a work environment free of harassment and intimidation;

(ii) “Harassment” means any unwelcome sexual advance, request for sexual favors or other verbal or written communication or physical conduct of a sexual nature, or sexually demeaning attitudes, causing interference with work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment, or the attempt to punish the complainant for refusal to comply to such a request or is made a condition for employment; The above is unacceptable behavior in the organization and at the workplace, including in any interaction or situation that is linked to official work or official activity outside the office. Explanation: There are three significant manifestations of harassment in the work environment:
(a) Abuse of authority
A demand by a person in authority, such as a supervisor, for sexual favors in order for the complainant to keep or obtain certain job benefits, be it a wage increase, a promotion, training opportunity, a transfer or the job itself.
(b) Creating a hostile environment
Any unwelcome sexual advance, request for sexual favors or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature, which interferes with an individual‟s work performance or creates an intimidating, hostile, abusive or offensive work environment. The typical “hostile environment” claim, in general, requires finding of a pattern of offensive conduct, however, in cases where the harassment is particularly severe, such as in cases involving physical contact, a single offensive incident will constitute a violation.
(c) Retaliation:
The refusal to grant a sexual favor can result in retaliation, which may include limiting the employee‟s options for future promotions or training, distorting the evaluation reports, generating gossip against the employee or other ways of limiting access to his/her rights. Such behavior is also a part of the harassment.

(iii) An informal approach to resolve a complaint of harassment may be through mediation between the parties involved and by providing advice and counseling on a strictly confidential basis;


(iv) A complainant or a staff member designated by the complainant for the purpose may report an incident of harassment informally to her supervisor, or a member of the Inquiry Committee, in which case the supervisor or the Committee member may address the issue at her discretion in the spirit of this Code. The request may be made orally or in writing;

(v) If the case is taken up for investigation at an informal level, a senior manager from the office or the head office will conduct the investigation in a confidential manner. The alleged accused will be approached with the intention of resolving the matter in a confidential manner;

(vi) If the incident or the case reported does constitute harassment of a higher degree and the officer or a member reviewing the case feels that it needs to be pursued formally for a disciplinary action, with the consent of the complainant, the case can be taken as a formal complaint;

(vii) A complainant does not necessarily have to take a complaint of harassment through the informal channel. She can launch a formal complaint at any time;

(viii) The complainant may make formal complaint through her incharge, supervisor, CBA nominee or worker's representative, as the case may be, or directly to any member of the Inquiry Committee. The Committee member approached is obligated to initiate the process of investigation. The supervisor shall facilitate the process and is obligated not to cover up or obstruct the inquiry;

(ix) Assistance in the inquiry procedure can be sought from any member of the organization who should be contacted to assist in such a case;

(x) The employer shall do its best to temporarily make adjustments so that the accused and the complainant do not have to interact for official purposes during the investigation period. This would include temporarily changing the office, in case both sit in one office, or taking away any extra charge (over and above their contract) which may give one party excessive powers over the other's job conditions. The employer can also decide to send the accused on leave, or suspend the accused in accordance with the applicable procedures for dealing with the cases of misconduct, if required;

(xi) Retaliation from either party should be strictly monitored. During the process of the investigation work, evaluation, daily duties, reporting structure and any parallel inquiries initiated should be strictly monitored to avoid any retaliation from either side;

(xii) The harassment usually occurs between colleagues when they are alone, therefore usually it is difficult to produce evidence. It is strongly recommended that staff should report an offensive behavior immediately to someone they trust, even if they do not wish to make a formal complaint at the time. Although not reporting immediately shall not affect the merits of the case; and

(xiii) The Code lays down the minimum standards of behavior regarding protection of women from harassment at workplace etc but will not affect any better arrangement that an organization may have developed nor will it bar the grant of protection that employees working in an institute may secure from their employers through negotiation.

STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS

The objective of this Act is to create a safe working environment for women, which is free of harassment, abuse and intimidation with a view toward fulfillment of their right to work with dignity. It will also enable higher productivity and a better quality of life at work. Harassment is one of the biggest hurdles faced by working women preventing many who want to work to get themselves and their families out of poverty.
This Act will open the path for women to participate more fully in the development of this country at all levels. This Act builds on the principles of equal opportunity for men and women and their right to earn a livelihood without fear of discrimination as stipulated in the Constitution. This Act complies with the Government‟s commitment to high international labour standards and empowerment of women. It also adheres to the Human Rights Declaration, the United Nation‟s Convention for Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women and ILO‟s convention 100 and 111 on workers‟ rights. It adheres to the principles of Islam and all other religions in our country which assure women‟s dignity. This Act requires all public and private organizations to adopt an internal Code of Conduct and a complain/appeals mechanism aimed at establishing a safe working environment, free of intimidation and abuse, for all working women. It shall also establish an Ombudsman at Federal and provincial levels.

MINISTER-IN-CHARGE
YOUSAF RAZA GILLANI
PRIME MINISTER ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN

Saturday, March 13, 2010

The footprints of cruelty‏



This picture shows a worker polishing the floor of Karachi airport arrival lounge entrance, at midnight on 11 March 2010. The chemicals used in the polishing compound are highly corrosive to skin and destroy the sole of your feet in a matter of few hours. The worker is performing this job with absolutely no foot protection. I have often asked such workers to show me the bottom of their feet, only to find that a few days of work leaves them completely sole-less and with deep open wounds. It is disgusting that the largest and the most modern international airport of Pakistan shows such complete lack of concern for the health and safety of the poor contract workers. This is not just inhuman but also criminal. Should not the soul-less Civil Aviation Authority be held responsible for this criminal behaviour?

By N Sadiq